(SHORT
NOTES FROM PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS:
General
Problem-Solving Tools at http://www.mindtools.com)
In general, people like to consult
others when there's a problem to solve or a decision to make. This is because, as individuals, people have
limited perspectives; and what may at first appear to be the best solution from
one vantage point may no longer seem so after the fuller picture is seen.
Involving other people who inevitably
have different perspectives and views, helps to ensure that solutions from all
possible sides has been considered. It
forces us to consider all options, and make sure that the decisions are made for
the best reasons.
Constructive Controversy is used to test
a proposed solution by subjecting it to the "clash of ideas", showing
it to be wrong, proving it, or improving it. This problem-solving approach was introduced
by David Johnson and Roger Johnson in 1979. The technique draws on 5 key assumptions:
1. adopting initial perspective towards a problem based
on personal experiences and perceptions
2. persuading others to agree will strengthens our
belief that we are right
3. beginning to doubt our rationale when confronted
with competing viewpoints
4. doubting causes us to seek more information and
build a better perspective, because we want to be confident with the choice
5. searching for a fuller perspective leads to better
overall decision making
The resulting process is shown in Figure
1 below:
Constructive Controversy tends to
produce better solutions, compared with solving problems using consensus,
debate, or individual effort because the Constructive Controversy process
forces us to face our assumptions and avoid drawing conclusions too quickly. It also pushes us to use clear reasoning to
defend or argue against a position, and it helps to protect us from logical
fallacies and blind spots, because we're forced to explain and defend our
rationale.
Constructive Controversy is a formal
procedure to manage controversy in a positive way:
1. Brainstorm Possible Solutions to the Problem
2. Form Advocacy Teams
3. Engage in Constructive Controversy
4. Decide
The "Rules" of Constructive
Controversy
1. Demonstrate mutual respect at all times.
2. Criticize ideas, not people.
3. Remember that they, as people, are not being
criticized, just the ideas they're putting forwards at the time.
4. Focus on good decision-making, not winning.
5. Listen actively, and ask for clarification when
necessary.
6. Commit to understanding all sides of an issue.
7. Are willing to change positions when the evidence
suggests it's necessary.
8. Use rational arguments, including inductive and
deductive logic, and draw conclusions based on evidence and well-structured
reasoning.
Constructive Controversy is an effective
tool for developing well-rounded solutions to problems. The key is to adopt different perspectives to
gain a better understanding of the problem.
No comments:
Post a Comment