There has
been a distinct move from “quality assurance” to “quality improvement’. But roles and responsibilities in many
industries tend to follow the traditional modes where there are organizational
charts that illustrate a department structure.
It’s the case where the managers
work as a leadership team, distinct from the front-line staff. They participate in traditional managerial
roles that include responsibility for managing risk and quality of the service within
the organization. While the front-line
staff see their role as an implementation of new of new strategies that they
have had very little involvement in developing. The front-line staff may resist the changes
due to:
·
Not being
fully aware of the rational
·
Not feeling
that they are responsible for the outcome
·
Feeling that
their degree of involvement in the implementation is superficial.
The culture
now is to promote a quality improvement atmosphere where everyone shares in the
responsibility. There exist some
barriers when attempting to be more inclusive in participation in quality
improvement initiatives:
·
Resources
constraints (both economic and human)
·
Limitation
of additional finance and staff hours
·
Pressing
existing workloads where there is the need to get the work done and thus making
it difficult to schedule
·
Time as in
getting groups together to provide input and to plan quality improvement.
·
Time as in
to allow those group to function effectively in new team-based context.
Other
barriers are:
·
No clear
linkage between quality indicator and financial outcomes resulting in low level
of commitment from the management in allocating resources
·
Fear
·
Pacing
·
Timing
·
Sequencing
Strategies
to overcome the barriers:
·
Creative
scheduling to unable participation
·
Getting the
right people involved
·
Adult
learning as in gaining staff understanding of the importance of their
involvement.
·
Linking the
learning to real-life practical applications
·
Listening to
what matters most to clients
Organizational improvement initiatives often fail
because they attempt to do too much, too soon. It is
much more gratifying to have early successes with small improvements than
failing at an over-ambitions attempts at great selecting changes. It is important that these small improvement
be linked to an overall larger change.
Shared from article by
Allen Crimshaw
In Better Life
Accountants Today
February 2006
No comments:
Post a Comment